Vincent Whitchurch
effa7afc52
[ Upstream commit5cf4a8532c] According to the documentation in msg_zerocopy.rst, the SO_ZEROCOPY flag was introduced because send(2) ignores unknown message flags and any legacy application which was accidentally passing the equivalent of MSG_ZEROCOPY earlier should not see any new behaviour. Before commitf214f915e7("tcp: enable MSG_ZEROCOPY"), a send(2) call which passed the equivalent of MSG_ZEROCOPY without setting SO_ZEROCOPY would succeed. However, after that commit, it fails with -ENOBUFS. So it appears that the SO_ZEROCOPY flag fails to fulfill its intended purpose. Fix it. Fixes:f214f915e7("tcp: enable MSG_ZEROCOPY") Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux kernel ============ This file was moved to Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst Please notice that there are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or ``make pdfdocs``. There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory, several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation. See Documentation/00-INDEX for a list of what is contained in each file. Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.