[ Upstream commit fcf0e25ad4 ]
rcu_read_unlock_strict() can be called with preemption enabled
which can make for an unstable rdp and a racy norm value.
Fix this by dropping the preempt-count in __rcu_read_unlock()
after the call to rcu_read_unlock_strict(), adjusting the
preempt-count check appropriately.
Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 83b28cfe79 ]
With PREEMPT_RCU=n, cond_resched() provides urgently needed quiescent
states for read-side critical sections via rcu_all_qs().
One reason why this was needed: lacking preempt-count, the tick
handler has no way of knowing whether it is executing in a
read-side critical section or not.
With (PREEMPT_LAZY=y, PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=n), we get (PREEMPT_COUNT=y,
PREEMPT_RCU=n). In this configuration cond_resched() is a stub and
does not provide quiescent states via rcu_all_qs().
(PREEMPT_RCU=y provides this information via rcu_read_unlock() and
its nesting counter.)
So, use the availability of preempt_count() to report quiescent states
in rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq().
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 812a1c3b9f ]
A static analyzer for C, Smatch, reports and triggers below
warnings:
kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:1215 rcu_scale_init()
warn: inconsistent returns 'global &fullstop_mutex'.
The checker complains about, we do not unlock the "fullstop_mutex"
mutex, in case of hitting below error path:
<snip>
...
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jiffies_at_lazy_cb - jif_start < 2 * HZ)) {
pr_alert("ERROR: call_rcu() CBs are not being lazy as expected!\n");
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
return -1;
^^^^^^^^^^
...
<snip>
it happens because "-1" is returned right away instead of
doing a proper unwinding.
Fix it by jumping to "unwind" label instead of returning -1.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/ZxfTrHuEGtgnOYWp@pc636/T/
Fixes: 084e04fff1 ("rcuscale: Add laziness and kfree tests")
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a23da88c6c ]
KCSAN reports a data race when access the krcp->monitor_work.timer.expires
variable in the schedule_delayed_monitor_work() function:
<snip>
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __mod_timer / kvfree_call_rcu
read to 0xffff888237d1cce8 of 8 bytes by task 10149 on cpu 1:
schedule_delayed_monitor_work kernel/rcu/tree.c:3520 [inline]
kvfree_call_rcu+0x3b8/0x510 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3839
trie_update_elem+0x47c/0x620 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:441
bpf_map_update_value+0x324/0x350 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:203
generic_map_update_batch+0x401/0x520 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1849
bpf_map_do_batch+0x28c/0x3f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5143
__sys_bpf+0x2e5/0x7a0
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5741 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5739 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5739
x64_sys_call+0x2625/0x2d60 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:322
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xc9/0x1c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
write to 0xffff888237d1cce8 of 8 bytes by task 56 on cpu 0:
__mod_timer+0x578/0x7f0 kernel/time/timer.c:1173
add_timer_global+0x51/0x70 kernel/time/timer.c:1330
__queue_delayed_work+0x127/0x1a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2523
queue_delayed_work_on+0xdf/0x190 kernel/workqueue.c:2552
queue_delayed_work include/linux/workqueue.h:677 [inline]
schedule_delayed_monitor_work kernel/rcu/tree.c:3525 [inline]
kfree_rcu_monitor+0x5e8/0x660 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3643
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0x483/0x9a0 kernel/workqueue.c:3310
worker_thread+0x51d/0x6f0 kernel/workqueue.c:3391
kthread+0x1d1/0x210 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 56 Comm: kworker/u8:4 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-syzkaller-00050-g5b7c893ed5ed #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024
Workqueue: events_unbound kfree_rcu_monitor
<snip>
kfree_rcu_monitor() rearms the work if a "krcp" has to be still
offloaded and this is done without holding krcp->lock, whereas
the kvfree_call_rcu() holds it.
Fix it by acquiring the "krcp->lock" for kfree_rcu_monitor() so
both functions do not race anymore.
Reported-by: syzbot+061d370693bdd99f9d34@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZxZ68KmHDQYU0yfD@pc636/T/
Fixes: 8fc5494ad5 ("rcu/kvfree: Move need_offload_krc() out of krcp->lock")
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fd70e9f1d8 ]
For kernels built with CONFIG_FORCE_NR_CPUS=y, the nr_cpu_ids is
defined as NR_CPUS instead of the number of possible cpus, this
will cause the following system panic:
smpboot: Allowing 4 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
...
setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:512 nr_cpumask_bits:512 nr_cpu_ids:512 nr_node_ids:1
...
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff9911c8c8
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 15 Comm: rcu_tasks_trace Tainted: G W
6.6.21 #1 5dc7acf91a5e8e9ac9dcfc35bee0245691283ea6
RIP: 0010:rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0
RSP: 0018:ffffa371c00a3e60 EFLAGS: 00010082
CR2: ffffffff9911c8c8 CR3: 000000040fa20005 CR4: 00000000001706f0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die+0x23/0x80
? page_fault_oops+0xa4/0x180
? exc_page_fault+0x152/0x180
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x40
? rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0
? __pfx_rcu_tasks_kthread+0x40/0x40
rcu_tasks_one_gp+0x69/0x180
rcu_tasks_kthread+0x94/0xc0
kthread+0xe8/0x140
? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x34/0x80
? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x80
</TASK>
Considering that there may be holes in the CPU numbers, use the
maximum possible cpu number, instead of nr_cpu_ids, for configuring
enqueue and dequeue limits.
[ neeraj.upadhyay: Fix htmldocs build error reported by Stephen Rothwell ]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CALMA0xaTSMN+p4xUXkzrtR5r6k7hgoswcaXx7baR_z9r5jjskw@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
Reported-by: Zhixu Liu <zhixu.liu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 46faf9d8e1 ]
Holding a mutex across synchronize_rcu_tasks() and acquiring
that same mutex in code called from do_exit() after its call to
exit_tasks_rcu_start() but before its call to exit_tasks_rcu_stop()
results in deadlock. This is by design, because tasks that are far
enough into do_exit() are no longer present on the tasks list, making
it a bit difficult for RCU Tasks to find them, let alone wait on them
to do a voluntary context switch. However, such deadlocks are becoming
more frequent. In addition, lockdep currently does not detect such
deadlocks and they can be difficult to reproduce.
In addition, if a task voluntarily context switches during that time
(for example, if it blocks acquiring a mutex), then this task is in an
RCU Tasks quiescent state. And with some adjustments, RCU Tasks could
just as well take advantage of that fact.
This commit therefore initializes the data structures that will be needed
to rely on these quiescent states and to eliminate these deadlocks.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240118021842.290665-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com/
Reported-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Reported-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Stable-dep-of: fd70e9f1d8 ("rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit bfe93930ea ]
Holding a mutex across synchronize_rcu_tasks() and acquiring
that same mutex in code called from do_exit() after its call to
exit_tasks_rcu_start() but before its call to exit_tasks_rcu_stop()
results in deadlock. This is by design, because tasks that are far
enough into do_exit() are no longer present on the tasks list, making
it a bit difficult for RCU Tasks to find them, let alone wait on them
to do a voluntary context switch. However, such deadlocks are becoming
more frequent. In addition, lockdep currently does not detect such
deadlocks and they can be difficult to reproduce.
In addition, if a task voluntarily context switches during that time
(for example, if it blocks acquiring a mutex), then this task is in an
RCU Tasks quiescent state. And with some adjustments, RCU Tasks could
just as well take advantage of that fact.
This commit therefore adds the data structures that will be needed
to rely on these quiescent states and to eliminate these deadlocks.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240118021842.290665-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com/
Reported-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Reported-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Stable-dep-of: fd70e9f1d8 ("rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e62d8ae462 ]
The rcu_tasks_need_gpcb() samples ->percpu_dequeue_lim as part of the
condition clause of a "for" loop, which is a bit confusing. This commit
therefore hoists this sampling out of the loop, using the result loaded
in the condition clause.
So why does this work in the face of a concurrent switch from single-CPU
queueing to per-CPU queueing?
o The call_rcu_tasks_generic() that makes the change has already
enqueued its callback, which means that all of the other CPU's
callback queues are empty.
o For the call_rcu_tasks_generic() that first notices
the switch to per-CPU queues, the smp_store_release()
used to update ->percpu_enqueue_lim pairs with the
raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node()'s full barrier that is
between the READ_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift) and the
rcu_segcblist_enqueue() that enqueues the callback.
o Because this CPU's queue is empty (unless it happens to
be the original single queue, in which case there is no
need for synchronization), this call_rcu_tasks_generic()
will do an irq_work_queue() to schedule a handler for the
needed rcuwait_wake_up() call. This call will be ordered
after the first call_rcu_tasks_generic() function's change to
->percpu_dequeue_lim.
o This rcuwait_wake_up() will either happen before or after the
set_current_state() in rcuwait_wait_event(). If it happens
before, the "condition" argument's call to rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()
will be ordered after the original change, and all callbacks on
all CPUs will be visible. Otherwise, if it happens after, then
the grace-period kthread's state will be set back to running,
which will result in a later call to rcuwait_wait_event() and
thus to rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(), which will again see the change.
So it all works out.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: fd70e9f1d8 ("rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f7345ccc62 ]
After a CPU has set itself offline and before it eventually calls
rcutree_report_cpu_dead(), there are still opportunities for callbacks
to be enqueued, for example from a softirq. When that happens on NOCB,
the rcuog wake-up is deferred through an IPI to an online CPU in order
not to call into the scheduler and risk arming the RT-bandwidth after
hrtimers have been migrated out and disabled.
But performing a synchronized IPI from a softirq is buggy as reported in
the following scenario:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 26 at kernel/smp.c:633 smp_call_function_single
Modules linked in: rcutorture torture
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 26 Comm: migration/1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc1-00012-g9139f93209d1 #1
Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x320 <- __stop_cpus+0xd0/0x120
RIP: 0010:smp_call_function_single
<IRQ>
swake_up_one_online
__call_rcu_nocb_wake
__call_rcu_common
? rcu_torture_one_read
call_timer_fn
__run_timers
run_timer_softirq
handle_softirqs
irq_exit_rcu
? tick_handle_periodic
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
</IRQ>
Fix this with forcing deferred rcuog wake up through the NOCB timer when
the CPU is offline. The actual wake up will happen from
rcutree_report_cpu_dead().
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409231644.4c55582d-lkp@intel.com
Fixes: 9139f93209 ("rcu/nocb: Fix RT throttling hrtimer armed from offline CPU")
Reviewed-by: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b913c3fe68 ]
Currently IRQs are disabled on call_rcu() and then depending on the
context:
* If the CPU is in nocb mode:
- If the callback is enqueued in the bypass list, IRQs are re-enabled
implictly by rcu_nocb_try_bypass()
- If the callback is enqueued in the normal list, IRQs are re-enabled
implicitly by __call_rcu_nocb_wake()
* If the CPU is NOT in nocb mode, IRQs are reenabled explicitly from call_rcu()
This makes the code a bit hard to follow, especially as it interleaves
with nocb locking.
To make the IRQ flags coverage clearer and also in order to prepare for
moving all the nocb enqueue code to its own function, always re-enable
the IRQ flags explicitly from call_rcu().
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Stable-dep-of: f7345ccc62 ("rcu/nocb: Fix rcuog wake-up from offline softirq")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 11377947b5 ]
Currently, if the rcuscale module's async module parameter is specified
for RCU implementations that do not have async primitives such as RCU
Tasks Rude (which now lacks a call_rcu_tasks_rude() function), there
will be a series of splats due to calls to a NULL pointer. This commit
therefore warns of this situation, but switches to non-async testing.
Signed-off-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9139f93209 ]
After a CPU is marked offline and until it reaches its final trip to
idle, rcuo has several opportunities to be woken up, either because
a callback has been queued in the meantime or because
rcutree_report_cpu_dead() has issued the final deferred NOCB wake up.
If RCU-boosting is enabled, RCU kthreads are set to SCHED_FIFO policy.
And if RT-bandwidth is enabled, the related hrtimer might be armed.
However this then happens after hrtimers have been migrated at the
CPUHP_AP_HRTIMERS_DYING stage, which is broken as reported by the
following warning:
Call trace:
enqueue_hrtimer+0x7c/0xf8
hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x2b8/0x300
enqueue_task_rt+0x298/0x3f0
enqueue_task+0x94/0x188
ttwu_do_activate+0xb4/0x27c
try_to_wake_up+0x2d8/0x79c
wake_up_process+0x18/0x28
__wake_nocb_gp+0x80/0x1a0
do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_common+0x3c/0xcc
rcu_report_dead+0x68/0x1ac
cpuhp_report_idle_dead+0x48/0x9c
do_idle+0x288/0x294
cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x3c
secondary_start_kernel+0x138/0x158
Fix this with waking up rcuo using an IPI if necessary. Since the
existing API to deal with this situation only handles swait queue, rcuo
is only woken up from offline CPUs if it's not already waiting on a
grace period. In the worst case some callbacks will just wait for a
grace period to complete before being assigned to a subsequent one.
Reported-by: "Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)" <Cheng-Jui.Wang@mediatek.com>
Fixes: 5c0930ccaa ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e4f7805729 ]
The bypass lock contention mitigation assumes there can be at most
2 contenders on the bypass lock, following this scheme:
1) One kthread takes the bypass lock
2) Another one spins on it and increment the contended counter
3) A third one (a bypass enqueuer) sees the contended counter on and
busy loops waiting on it to decrement.
However this assumption is wrong. There can be only one CPU to find the
lock contended because call_rcu() (the bypass enqueuer) is the only
bypass lock acquire site that may not already hold the NOCB lock
beforehand, all the other sites must first contend on the NOCB lock.
Therefore step 2) is impossible.
The other problem is that the mitigation assumes that contenders all
belong to the same rdp CPU, which is also impossible for a raw spinlock.
In theory the warning could trigger if the enqueuer holds the bypass
lock and another CPU flushes the bypass queue concurrently but this is
prevented from all flush users:
1) NOCB kthreads only flush if they successfully _tried_ to lock the
bypass lock. So no contention management here.
2) Flush on callbacks migration happen remotely when the CPU is offline.
No concurrency against bypass enqueue.
3) Flush on deoffloading happen either locally with IRQs disabled or
remotely when the CPU is not yet online. No concurrency against
bypass enqueue.
4) Flush on barrier entrain happen either locally with IRQs disabled or
remotely when the CPU is offline. No concurrency against
bypass enqueue.
For those reasons, the bypass lock contention mitigation isn't needed
and is even wrong. Remove it but keep the warning reporting a contended
bypass lock on a remote CPU, to keep unexpected contention awareness.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0ae9942f03 ]
When using rcutorture as a module, there are a number of conditions that
can abort the modprobe operation, for example, when attempting to run
both RCU CPU stall warning tests and forward-progress tests. This can
cause rcu_torture_cleanup() to be invoked on the unwind path out of
rcu_rcu_torture_init(), which will mean that rcu_gp_slow_unregister()
is invoked without a matching rcu_gp_slow_register(). This will cause
a splat because rcu_gp_slow_unregister() is passed rcu_fwd_cb_nodelay,
which does not match a NULL pointer.
This commit therefore forgives a mismatch involving a NULL pointer, thus
avoiding this false-positive splat.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2cbc482d32 ]
When a structure containing an RCU callback rhp is (incorrectly) freed
and reallocated after rhp is passed to call_rcu(), it is not unusual for
rhp->func to be set to NULL. This defeats the debugging prints used by
__call_rcu_common() in kernels built with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y,
which expect to identify the offending code using the identity of this
function.
And in kernels build without CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y, things
are even worse, as can be seen from this splat:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0
... ...
PC is at 0x0
LR is at rcu_do_batch+0x1c0/0x3b8
... ...
(rcu_do_batch) from (rcu_core+0x1d4/0x284)
(rcu_core) from (__do_softirq+0x24c/0x344)
(__do_softirq) from (__irq_exit_rcu+0x64/0x108)
(__irq_exit_rcu) from (irq_exit+0x8/0x10)
(irq_exit) from (__handle_domain_irq+0x74/0x9c)
(__handle_domain_irq) from (gic_handle_irq+0x8c/0x98)
(gic_handle_irq) from (__irq_svc+0x5c/0x94)
(__irq_svc) from (arch_cpu_idle+0x20/0x3c)
(arch_cpu_idle) from (default_idle_call+0x4c/0x78)
(default_idle_call) from (do_idle+0xf8/0x150)
(do_idle) from (cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x20)
(cpu_startup_entry) from (0xc01530)
This commit therefore adds calls to mem_dump_obj(rhp) to output some
information, for example:
slab kmalloc-256 start ffff410c45019900 pointer offset 0 size 256
This provides the rough size of the memory block and the offset of the
rcu_head structure, which as least provides at least a few clues to help
locate the problem. If the problem is reproducible, additional slab
debugging can be enabled, for example, CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y, which can
provide significantly more information.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 55d4669ef1 ]
When rcu_barrier() calls rcu_rdp_cpu_online() and observes a CPU off
rnp->qsmaskinitnext, it means that all accesses from the offline CPU
preceding the CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU are visible to RCU barrier, including
callbacks expiration and counter updates.
However interrupts can still fire after stop_machine() re-enables
interrupts and before rcutree_report_cpu_dead(). The related accesses
happening between CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU and rnp->qsmaskinitnext clearing
are _NOT_ guaranteed to be seen by rcu_barrier() without proper
ordering, especially when callbacks are invoked there to the end, making
rcutree_migrate_callback() bypass barrier_lock.
The following theoretical race example can make rcu_barrier() hang:
CPU 0 CPU 1
----- -----
//cpu_down()
smpboot_park_threads()
//ksoftirqd is parked now
<IRQ>
rcu_sched_clock_irq()
invoke_rcu_core()
do_softirq()
rcu_core()
rcu_do_batch()
// callback storm
// rcu_do_batch() returns
// before completing all
// of them
// do_softirq also returns early because of
// timeout. It defers to ksoftirqd but
// it's parked
</IRQ>
stop_machine()
take_cpu_down()
rcu_barrier()
spin_lock(barrier_lock)
// observes rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist) != 0
<IRQ>
do_softirq()
rcu_core()
rcu_do_batch()
//completes all pending callbacks
//smp_mb() implied _after_ callback number dec
</IRQ>
rcutree_report_cpu_dead()
rnp->qsmaskinitnext &= ~rdp->grpmask;
rcutree_migrate_callback()
// no callback, early return without locking
// barrier_lock
//observes !rcu_rdp_cpu_online(rdp)
rcu_barrier_entrain()
rcu_segcblist_entrain()
// Observe rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(rsclp) == 0
// because no barrier between reading
// rnp->qsmaskinitnext and rsclp->len
rcu_segcblist_add_len()
smp_mb__before_atomic()
// will now observe the 0 count and empty
// list, but too late, we enqueue regardless
WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->len, rsclp->len + v);
// ignored barrier callback
// rcu barrier stall...
This could be solved with a read memory barrier, enforcing the message
passing between rnp->qsmaskinitnext and rsclp->len, matching the full
memory barrier after rsclp->len addition in rcu_segcblist_add_len()
performed at the end of rcu_do_batch().
However the rcu_barrier() is complicated enough and probably doesn't
need too many more subtleties. CPU down is a slowpath and the
barrier_lock seldom contended. Solve the issue with unconditionally
locking the barrier_lock on rcutree_migrate_callbacks(). This makes sure
that either rcu_barrier() sees the empty queue or its entrained
callback will be migrated.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6040072f47 ]
On powerpc systems, spinlock acquisition does not order prior stores
against later loads. This means that this statement:
rfcp->rfc_next = NULL;
Can be reordered to follow this statement:
WRITE_ONCE(*rfcpp, rfcp);
Which is then a data race with rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cr(), specifically,
this statement:
rfcpn = READ_ONCE(rfcp->rfc_next)
KCSAN located this data race, which represents a real failure on powerpc.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 399ced9594 ]
When RCU-TASKS-TRACE pre-gp takes a snapshot of the current task running
on all online CPUs, no explicit ordering synchronizes properly with a
context switch. This lack of ordering can permit the new task to miss
pre-grace-period update-side accesses. The following diagram, courtesy
of Paul, shows the possible bad scenario:
CPU 0 CPU 1
----- -----
// Pre-GP update side access
WRITE_ONCE(*X, 1);
smp_mb();
r0 = rq->curr;
RCU_INIT_POINTER(rq->curr, TASK_B)
spin_unlock(rq)
rcu_read_lock_trace()
r1 = X;
/* ignore TASK_B */
Either r0==TASK_B or r1==1 is needed but neither is guaranteed.
One possible solution to solve this is to wait for an RCU grace period
at the beginning of the RCU-tasks-trace grace period before taking the
current tasks snaphot. However this would introduce large additional
latencies to RCU-tasks-trace grace periods.
Another solution is to lock the target runqueue while taking the current
task snapshot. This ensures that the update side sees the latest context
switch and subsequent context switches will see the pre-grace-period
update side accesses.
This commit therefore adds runqueue locking to cpu_curr_snapshot().
Fixes: e386b67257 ("rcu-tasks: Eliminate RCU Tasks Trace IPIs to online CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 3758f7d991 ]
The rcuc-starvation output from print_cpu_stall_info() might overflow the
buffer if there is a huge difference in jiffies difference. The situation
might seem improbable, but computers sometimes get very confused about
time, which can result in full-sized integers, and, in this case,
buffer overflow.
Also, the unsigned jiffies difference is printed using %ld, which is
normally for signed integers. This is intentional for debugging purposes,
but it is not obvious from the code.
This commit therefore changes sprintf() to snprintf() and adds a
clarifying comment about intention of %ld format.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 245a629825 ("rcu: Dump rcuc kthread status for CPUs not reporting quiescent state")
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@ancud.ru>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit cc5645fddb ]
There is a possibility of buffer overflow in
show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread() if counters, passed
to sprintf() are huge. Counter numbers, needed for this
are unrealistically high, but buffer overflow is still
possible.
Use snprintf() with buffer size instead of sprintf().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: edf3775f0a ("rcu-tasks: Add count for idle tasks on offline CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@ancud.ru>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This is the 6.6.30 stable release
Signed-off-by: Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
drivers/tty/serial/serial_port.c
drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
kernel/panic.c
kernel/printk/printk.c
[ Upstream commit e7539ffc9a ]
Just like is done for the kworker performing nodes initialization,
gracefully handle the possible allocation failure of the RCU expedited
grace period main kworker.
While at it perform a rename of the related checking functions to better
reflect the expedited specifics.
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Fixes: 9621fbee44 ("rcu: Move expedited grace period (GP) work to RT kthread_worker")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a636c5e6f8 ]
Under CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD=y, the nodes initialization for expedited
grace periods is queued to a kworker. However if the allocation of that
kworker failed, the nodes initialization is performed synchronously by
the caller instead.
Now the check for kworker initialization failure relies on the kworker
pointer to be NULL while its value might actually encapsulate an
allocation failure error.
Make sure to handle this case.
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Fixes: 9621fbee44 ("rcu: Move expedited grace period (GP) work to RT kthread_worker")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e787644caf ]
When the CPU goes idle for the last time during the CPU down hotplug
process, RCU reports a final quiescent state for the current CPU. If
this quiescent state propagates up to the top, some tasks may then be
woken up to complete the grace period: the main grace period kthread
and/or the expedited main workqueue (or kworker).
If those kthreads have a SCHED_FIFO policy, the wake up can indirectly
arm the RT bandwith timer to the local offline CPU. Since this happens
after hrtimers have been migrated at CPUHP_AP_HRTIMERS_DYING stage, the
timer gets ignored. Therefore if the RCU kthreads are waiting for RT
bandwidth to be available, they may never be actually scheduled.
This triggers TREE03 rcutorture hangs:
rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
rcu: 4-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=9874/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=0/0 fqs=20 rcuc=21071 jiffies(starved)
rcu: (t=21035 jiffies g=938281 q=40787 ncpus=6)
rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 20964 jiffies! g938281 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=0
rcu: Unless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior.
rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
task:rcu_preempt state:R running task stack:14896 pid:14 tgid:14 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__schedule+0x2eb/0xa80
schedule+0x1f/0x90
schedule_timeout+0x163/0x270
? __pfx_process_timeout+0x10/0x10
rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x37c/0x5b0
? __pfx_rcu_gp_kthread+0x10/0x10
rcu_gp_kthread+0x17c/0x200
kthread+0xde/0x110
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x40
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK>
The situation can't be solved with just unpinning the timer. The hrtimer
infrastructure and the nohz heuristics involved in finding the best
remote target for an unpinned timer would then also need to handle
enqueues from an offline CPU in the most horrendous way.
So fix this on the RCU side instead and defer the wake up to an online
CPU if it's too late for the local one.
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Fixes: 5c0930ccaa ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a80712b9cc ]
The commit:
cff9b2332a ("kernel/sched: Modify initial boot task idle setup")
has changed the semantics of what is to be considered an idle task in
such a way that the idle task of an offline CPU may not carry the
PF_IDLE flag anymore.
However RCU-tasks-trace tests the opposite assertion, still assuming
that idle tasks carry the PF_IDLE flag during their whole lifecycle.
Remove this assumption to avoid spurious warnings but keep the initial
test verifying that the idle task is the current task on any offline
CPU.
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Fixes: cff9b2332a ("kernel/sched: Modify initial boot task idle setup")
Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Suggested-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9715ed501b ]
The commit:
cff9b2332a ("kernel/sched: Modify initial boot task idle setup")
has changed the semantics of what is to be considered an idle task in
such a way that CPU boot code preceding the actual idle loop is excluded
from it.
This has however introduced new potential RCU-tasks stalls when either:
1) Grace period is started before init/0 had a chance to set PF_IDLE,
keeping it stuck in the holdout list until idle ever schedules.
2) Grace period is started when some possible CPUs have never been
online, keeping their idle tasks stuck in the holdout list until the
CPU ever boots up.
3) Similar to 1) but with secondary CPUs: Grace period is started
concurrently with secondary CPU booting, putting its idle task in
the holdout list because PF_IDLE isn't yet observed on it. It stays
then stuck in the holdout list until that CPU ever schedules. The
effect is mitigated here by the hotplug AP thread that must run to
bring the CPU up.
Fix this with handling the new semantics of PF_IDLE, keeping in mind
that it may or may not be set on an idle task. Take advantage of that to
strengthen the coverage of an RCU-tasks quiescent state within an idle
task, excluding the CPU boot code from it. Only the code running within
the idle loop is now a quiescent state, along with offline CPUs.
Fixes: cff9b2332a ("kernel/sched: Modify initial boot task idle setup")
Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Suggested-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2be4686d86 ]
Export the RCU point of view as to when a CPU is considered offline
(ie: when does RCU consider that a CPU is sufficiently down in the
hotplug process to not feature any possible read side).
This will be used by RCU-tasks whose vision of an offline CPU should
reasonably match the one of RCU core.
Fixes: cff9b2332a ("kernel/sched: Modify initial boot task idle setup")
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 85d68222dd ]
Commit 851a723e45 ("sched: Always clear user_cpus_ptr in
do_set_cpus_allowed()") added a kfree() call to free any user
provided affinity mask, if present. It was changed later to use
kfree_rcu() in commit 9a5418bc48 ("sched/core: Use kfree_rcu()
in do_set_cpus_allowed()") to avoid a circular locking dependency
problem.
It turns out that even kfree_rcu() isn't safe for avoiding
circular locking problem. As reported by kernel test robot,
the following circular locking dependency now exists:
&rdp->nocb_lock --> rcu_node_0 --> &rq->__lock
Solve this by breaking the rcu_node_0 --> &rq->__lock chain by moving
the resched_cpu() out from under rcu_node lock.
[peterz: heavily borrowed from Waiman's Changelog]
[paulmck: applied Z qiang feedback]
Fixes: 851a723e45 ("sched: Always clear user_cpus_ptr in do_set_cpus_allowed()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202310302207.a25f1a30-oliver.sang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 5f98fd034c upstream.
Since the actual slab freeing is deferred when calling kvfree_rcu(), so
is the kmemleak_free() callback informing kmemleak of the object
deletion. From the perspective of the kvfree_rcu() caller, the object is
freed and it may remove any references to it. Since kmemleak does not
scan RCU internal data storing the pointer, it will report such objects
as leaks during the grace period.
Tell kmemleak to ignore such objects on the kvfree_call_rcu() path. Note
that the tiny RCU implementation does not have such issue since the
objects can be tracked from the rcu_ctrlblk structure.
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/F903A825-F05F-4B77-A2B5-7356282FBA2C@apple.com/
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Tested-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Clark Williams