selftests/bpf: Add F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS to some tests
Some verifier tests were missing F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, which made the test fail. Add the flag where needed. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230705113926.751791-2-bjorn@kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Daniel Borkmann
parent
cf6eeb8f9d
commit
ce1f289f54
@@ -242,4 +242,5 @@
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access",
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R10 partial copy of pointer",
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1169,6 +1169,7 @@
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pkt_end < pkt taken check",
|
||||
@@ -1190,4 +1191,5 @@
|
||||
},
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.retval = 2,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"jgt32: BPF_K",
|
||||
@@ -360,6 +361,7 @@
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.retval = 2,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"jle32: BPF_K",
|
||||
@@ -430,6 +432,7 @@
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.retval = 2,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"jlt32: BPF_K",
|
||||
@@ -500,6 +503,7 @@
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.retval = 2,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"jsge32: BPF_K",
|
||||
@@ -570,6 +574,7 @@
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.retval = 2,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"jsgt32: BPF_K",
|
||||
@@ -640,6 +645,7 @@
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.retval = 2,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"jsle32: BPF_K",
|
||||
@@ -710,6 +716,7 @@
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.retval = 2,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"jslt32: BPF_K",
|
||||
@@ -780,6 +787,7 @@
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = ACCEPT,
|
||||
.retval = 2,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"jgt32: range bound deduction, reg op imm",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
|
||||
.fixup_map_kptr = { 1 },
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "kptr access cannot have variable offset",
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"map_kptr: bpf_kptr_xchg non-const var_off",
|
||||
@@ -121,6 +122,7 @@
|
||||
.fixup_map_kptr = { 1 },
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.errstr = "kptr access misaligned expected=0 off=7",
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"map_kptr: reject var_off != 0",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map_ringbuf = { 1 },
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
|
||||
.flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
|
||||
.flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ | F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
.errstr = "invalid access to memory, mem_size=1 off=42 size=8",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user