bcachefs: fsck: additional diagnostics for reattach_inode()
Log the inode's new path. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -399,6 +399,8 @@ static int reattach_inode(struct btree_trans *trans, struct bch_inode_unpacked *
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
bch_verbose(c, "got lostfound inum %llu", lostfound.bi_inum);
|
||||
|
||||
lostfound.bi_nlink += S_ISDIR(inode->bi_mode);
|
||||
|
||||
/* ensure lost+found inode is also present in inode snapshot */
|
||||
@@ -435,6 +437,16 @@ static int reattach_inode(struct btree_trans *trans, struct bch_inode_unpacked *
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
CLASS(printbuf, buf)();
|
||||
ret = bch2_inum_snapshot_to_path(trans, inode->bi_inum,
|
||||
inode->bi_snapshot, NULL, &buf);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
bch_info(c, "reattached at %s", buf.buf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Fix up inodes in child snapshots: if they should also be reattached
|
||||
* update the backpointer field, if they should not be we need to emit
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user