wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: consider having one active link
Do not call iwl_mvm_mld_get_primary_link if only one link
is active.
In that case, the sole active link should be used.
iwl_mvm_mld_get_primary_link returns -1 if only one link
is active causing a warning.
Fixes: 8c9bef26e9 ("wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: d3: implement suspend with MLO")
Signed-off-by: Shaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240311081938.6c50061bf69b.I05b0ac7fa7149eabaa5570a6f65b0d9bfb09a6f1@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Johannes Berg
parent
bbe806c294
commit
847d7353e5
@@ -1260,15 +1260,15 @@ static int __iwl_mvm_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
|
||||
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(vif))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ieee80211_vif_is_mld(vif) && vif->cfg.assoc) {
|
||||
if (hweight16(vif->active_links) > 1) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Select the 'best' link. May need to revisit, it seems
|
||||
* better to not optimize for throughput but rather range,
|
||||
* reliability and power here - and select 2.4 GHz ...
|
||||
* Select the 'best' link.
|
||||
* May need to revisit, it seems better to not optimize
|
||||
* for throughput but rather range, reliability and
|
||||
* power here - and select 2.4 GHz ...
|
||||
*/
|
||||
primary_link =
|
||||
iwl_mvm_mld_get_primary_link(mvm, vif,
|
||||
vif->active_links);
|
||||
primary_link = iwl_mvm_mld_get_primary_link(mvm, vif,
|
||||
vif->active_links);
|
||||
|
||||
if (WARN_ONCE(primary_link < 0, "no primary link in 0x%x\n",
|
||||
vif->active_links))
|
||||
@@ -1277,6 +1277,8 @@ static int __iwl_mvm_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
|
||||
ret = ieee80211_set_active_links(vif, BIT(primary_link));
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
} else if (vif->active_links) {
|
||||
primary_link = __ffs(vif->active_links);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
primary_link = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user