staging: vchiq_arm: Fix missing refcount decrement in error path for fw_node
commit22a3703af1upstream. An error path was introduced without including the required call to of_node_put() to decrement the node's refcount and avoid leaking memory. If the call to kzalloc() for 'mgmt' fails, the probe returns without decrementing the refcount. Use the automatic cleanup facility to fix the bug and protect the code against new error paths where the call to of_node_put() might be missing again. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes:1c9e16b731("staging: vc04_services: vchiq_arm: Split driver static and runtime data") Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014-vchiq_arm-of_node_put-v2-2-cafe0a4c2666@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
70777a23a5
commit
7d4fb115fb
@@ -1715,7 +1715,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, vchiq_of_match);
|
||||
|
||||
static int vchiq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct device_node *fw_node;
|
||||
const struct vchiq_platform_info *info;
|
||||
struct vchiq_drv_mgmt *mgmt;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
@@ -1724,8 +1723,8 @@ static int vchiq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
if (!info)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
fw_node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
|
||||
"raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware");
|
||||
struct device_node *fw_node __free(device_node) =
|
||||
of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware");
|
||||
if (!fw_node) {
|
||||
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing firmware node\n");
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
@@ -1736,7 +1735,6 @@ static int vchiq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
mgmt->fw = devm_rpi_firmware_get(&pdev->dev, fw_node);
|
||||
of_node_put(fw_node);
|
||||
if (!mgmt->fw)
|
||||
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user