iwlwifi: mvm: improve TDLS ch-sw state machine
Add a response-received state and add more limits on allowed requests in each state of the connection. Previously ch-switch requests from other peers could interrupt an outgoing active ch-switch. Also stale packets from the current peer could disrupt the channel switch state. Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arikx.nemtsov@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Emmanuel Grumbach
parent
cd8f438405
commit
5cb1270143
@@ -532,6 +532,7 @@ enum {
|
||||
enum iwl_mvm_tdls_cs_state {
|
||||
IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_IDLE = 0,
|
||||
IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_REQ_SENT,
|
||||
IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_RESP_RCVD,
|
||||
IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_REQ_RCVD,
|
||||
IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_ACTIVE,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -228,6 +228,8 @@ iwl_mvm_tdls_cs_state_str(enum iwl_mvm_tdls_cs_state state)
|
||||
return "IDLE";
|
||||
case IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_REQ_SENT:
|
||||
return "REQ SENT";
|
||||
case IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_RESP_RCVD:
|
||||
return "RESP RECEIVED";
|
||||
case IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_REQ_RCVD:
|
||||
return "REQ RECEIVED";
|
||||
case IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_ACTIVE:
|
||||
@@ -325,17 +327,27 @@ iwl_mvm_tdls_check_action(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_REQ_SENT:
|
||||
/* only allow requests from the same peer */
|
||||
if (!same_peer)
|
||||
ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||
else if (type == TDLS_SEND_CHAN_SW_RESP_AND_MOVE_CH &&
|
||||
!peer_initiator)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We received a ch-switch request while an outgoing
|
||||
* one is pending. Allow it if the peer is the link
|
||||
* initiator.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||
else if (type == TDLS_SEND_CHAN_SW_REQ)
|
||||
/* wait for idle before sending another request */
|
||||
ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_RESP_RCVD:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We received a ch-switch request while an outgoing one is
|
||||
* pending. Allow it to proceed if the other peer is the same
|
||||
* one we sent to, and we are not the link initiator.
|
||||
* we are waiting for the FW to give an "active" notification,
|
||||
* so ignore requests in the meantime
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (type == TDLS_SEND_CHAN_SW_RESP_AND_MOVE_CH) {
|
||||
if (!same_peer)
|
||||
ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||
else if (!peer_initiator) /* we are the initiator */
|
||||
ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_REQ_RCVD:
|
||||
/* as above, allow the link initiator to proceed */
|
||||
@@ -349,9 +361,12 @@ iwl_mvm_tdls_check_action(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_ACTIVE:
|
||||
/* we don't allow initiations during active channel switch */
|
||||
if (type == TDLS_SEND_CHAN_SW_REQ)
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* the only valid request when active is a request to return
|
||||
* to the base channel by the current off-channel peer
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (type != TDLS_MOVE_CH || !same_peer)
|
||||
ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -473,6 +488,8 @@ iwl_mvm_tdls_config_channel_switch(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
|
||||
type == TDLS_SEND_CHAN_SW_REQ ?
|
||||
IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_REQ_SENT :
|
||||
IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_REQ_RCVD);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
iwl_mvm_tdls_update_cs_state(mvm, IWL_MVM_TDLS_SW_RESP_RCVD);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
@@ -657,12 +674,15 @@ iwl_mvm_tdls_recv_channel_switch(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
|
||||
struct iwl_mvm *mvm = IWL_MAC80211_GET_MVM(hw);
|
||||
enum iwl_tdls_channel_switch_type type;
|
||||
unsigned int delay;
|
||||
const char *action_str =
|
||||
params->action_code == WLAN_TDLS_CHANNEL_SWITCH_REQUEST ?
|
||||
"REQ" : "RESP";
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&mvm->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
IWL_DEBUG_TDLS(mvm,
|
||||
"Received TDLS ch switch action %d from %pM status %d\n",
|
||||
params->action_code, params->sta->addr, params->status);
|
||||
"Received TDLS ch switch action %s from %pM status %d\n",
|
||||
action_str, params->sta->addr, params->status);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* we got a non-zero status from a peer we were switching to - move to
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user