arm64: mm: fix p?d_leaf()
The pmd_leaf() is used to test a leaf mapped PMD, however, it misses the PROT_NONE mapped PMD on arm64. Fix it. A real world issue [1] caused by this was reported by Qian Cai. Also fix pud_leaf(). Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/24798260/ [1] Fixes: 8aa82df3c123 ("arm64: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions") Reported-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422060033.48711-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ff74a23e0
commit
23bc8f69f0
@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ extern pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn,
|
||||
PMD_TYPE_TABLE)
|
||||
#define pmd_sect(pmd) ((pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TYPE_MASK) == \
|
||||
PMD_TYPE_SECT)
|
||||
#define pmd_leaf(pmd) pmd_sect(pmd)
|
||||
#define pmd_leaf(pmd) (pmd_present(pmd) && !pmd_table(pmd))
|
||||
#define pmd_bad(pmd) (!pmd_table(pmd))
|
||||
|
||||
#define pmd_leaf_size(pmd) (pmd_cont(pmd) ? CONT_PMD_SIZE : PMD_SIZE)
|
||||
@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_page_vaddr(pmd_t pmd)
|
||||
#define pud_none(pud) (!pud_val(pud))
|
||||
#define pud_bad(pud) (!pud_table(pud))
|
||||
#define pud_present(pud) pte_present(pud_pte(pud))
|
||||
#define pud_leaf(pud) pud_sect(pud)
|
||||
#define pud_leaf(pud) (pud_present(pud) && !pud_table(pud))
|
||||
#define pud_valid(pud) pte_valid(pud_pte(pud))
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void set_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud)
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user