On 2/28/07, KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@balabit.hu> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While reading TCP minisock code I've found this suspiciously looking
> code fragment:
>
> - 8< -
> struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct sock *newsk = inet_csk_clone(sk, req, GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> if (newsk != NULL) {
> const struct inet_request_sock *ireq = inet_rsk(req);
> struct tcp_request_sock *treq = tcp_rsk(req);
> struct inet_connection_sock *newicsk = inet_csk(sk);
> struct tcp_sock *newtp;
> - 8< -
>
> The above code initializes newicsk to inet_csk(sk), isn't that supposed
> to be inet_csk(newsk)? As far as I can tell this might leave
> icsk_ack.last_seg_size zero even if we do have received data.
Good catch!
David, please apply the attached patch.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
248059edc6