This introduces a per-filter flag (SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_WAIT_KILLABLE_RECV)
that makes it so that when notifications are received by the supervisor the
notifying process will transition to wait killable semantics. Although wait
killable isn't a set of semantics formally exposed to userspace, the
concept is searchable. If the notifying process is signaled prior to the
notification being received by the userspace agent, it will be handled as
normal.
One quirk about how this is handled is that the notifying process
only switches to TASK_KILLABLE if it receives a wakeup from either
an addfd or a signal. This is to avoid an unnecessary wakeup of
the notifying task.
The reasons behind switching into wait_killable only after userspace
receives the notification are:
* Avoiding unncessary work - Often, workloads will perform work that they
may abort (request racing comes to mind). This allows for syscalls to be
aborted safely prior to the notification being received by the
supervisor. In this, the supervisor doesn't end up doing work that the
workload does not want to complete anyways.
* Avoiding side effects - We don't want the syscall to be interruptible
once the supervisor starts doing work because it may not be trivial
to reverse the operation. For example, unmounting a file system may
take a long time, and it's hard to rollback, or treat that as
reentrant.
* Avoid breaking runtimes - Various runtimes do not GC when they are
during a syscall (or while running native code that subsequently
calls a syscall). If many notifications are blocked, and not picked
up by the supervisor, this can get the application into a bad state.
Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220503080958.20220-2-sargun@sargun.me
c2aa2dfef2
