ringbuf_process_ring() return int64_t, while ring__consume_n() assigns
it to int. It's highly unlikely, but possible for ringbuf_process_ring()
to return value larger than INT_MAX, so use int64_t. ring__consume_n()
does check INT_MAX before returning int result to the user.
Fixes: 4d22ea94ea33 ("libbpf: Add ring__consume_n / ring_buffer__consume_n")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430201952.888293-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| api | ||
| bpf | ||
| perf | ||
| subcmd | ||
| symbol | ||
| thermal | ||
| argv_split.c | ||
| bitmap.c | ||
| ctype.c | ||
| find_bit.c | ||
| hweight.c | ||
| list_sort.c | ||
| rbtree.c | ||
| slab.c | ||
| str_error_r.c | ||
| string.c | ||
| vsprintf.c | ||
| zalloc.c | ||