[ Upstream commit 5e53e4a66b ]
Currently, RK809's BUCK3 regulator is modelled in the driver as a
configurable regulator with 0.5-2.4V voltage range. But the voltage
setting is not actually applied, because when bit 6 of
PMIC_POWER_CONFIG register is set to 0 (default), BUCK3 output voltage
is determined by the external feedback resistor. Fix this, by setting
bit 6 when voltage selection is set. Existing users which do not
specify voltage constraints in their device trees will not be affected
by this change, since no voltage setting is applied in those cases,
and bit 6 is not enabled.
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241017-rk809-dcdc3-v1-1-e3c3de92f39c@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 2a4b49bb58 upstream.
regulator_get() may sometimes be called more than once for the same
consumer device, something which before commit dbe954d8f1 ("regulator:
core: Avoid debugfs: Directory ... already present! error") resulted in
errors being logged.
A couple of recent commits broke the handling of such cases so that
attributes are now erroneously created in the debugfs root directory the
second time a regulator is requested and the log is filled with errors
like:
debugfs: File 'uA_load' in directory '/' already present!
debugfs: File 'min_uV' in directory '/' already present!
debugfs: File 'max_uV' in directory '/' already present!
debugfs: File 'constraint_flags' in directory '/' already present!
on any further calls.
Fixes: 2715bb11cf ("regulator: core: Fix more error checking for debugfs_create_dir()")
Fixes: 08880713ce ("regulator: core: Streamline debugfs operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240509133304.8883-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 7993d3a9c3 ]
The use_count of a regulator should only be incremented when the
enable_count changes from 0 to 1. Similarly, the use_count should
only be decremented when the enable_count changes from 1 to 0.
In the previous implementation, use_count was sometimes decremented
to 0 when some consumer called unbalanced disable,
leading to unexpected disable even the regulator is enabled by
other consumers. With this change, the use_count accurately reflects
the number of users which the regulator is enabled.
This should make things more robust in the case where a consumer does
leak references.
Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <zr.zhang@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103074231.8031-1-zr.zhang@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 08880713ce ]
If CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set:
regulator: Failed to create debugfs directory
...
regulator-dummy: Failed to create debugfs directory
As per the comments for debugfs_create_dir(), errors returned by this
function should be expected, and ignored:
* If debugfs is not enabled in the kernel, the value -%ENODEV will be
* returned.
*
* NOTE: it's expected that most callers should _ignore_ the errors returned
* by this function. Other debugfs functions handle the fact that the "dentry"
* passed to them could be an error and they don't crash in that case.
* Drivers should generally work fine even if debugfs fails to init anyway.
Adhere to the debugfs spirit, and streamline all operations by:
1. Demoting the importance of the printed error messages to debug
level, like is already done in create_regulator(),
2. Further ignoring any returned errors, as by design, all debugfs
functions are no-ops when passed an error pointer.
Fixes: 2bf1c45be3 ("regulator: Fix error checking for debugfs_create_dir")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2f8bb6e113359ddfab7b59e4d4274bd4c06d6d0a.1685013051.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c4a413e56d ]
Smatch reports:
drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:166 stm32_pwr_regulator_probe() warn:
'base' from of_iomap() not released on lines: 151,166.
In stm32_pwr_regulator_probe(), base is not released
when devm_kzalloc() fails to allocate memory or
devm_regulator_register() fails to register a new regulator device,
which may cause a leak.
To fix this issue, replace of_iomap() with
devm_platform_ioremap_resource(). devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
is a specialized function for platform devices.
It allows 'base' to be automatically released whether the probe
function succeeds or fails.
Besides, use IS_ERR(base) instead of !base
as the return value of devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
can either be a pointer to the remapped memory or
an ERR_PTR() encoded error code if the operation fails.
Fixes: dc62f951a6 ("regulator: stm32-pwr: Fix return value check in stm32_pwr_regulator_probe()")
Signed-off-by: YAN SHI <m202071378@hust.edu.cn>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304111750.o2643eJN-lkp@intel.com/
Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230412033529.18890-1-m202071378@hust.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit cba6cfdc7c ]
An automated bot told me that there was a potential lockdep problem
with regulators. This was on the chromeos-5.15 kernel, but I see
nothing that would be different downstream compared to upstream. The
bot said:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.15.104-lockdep-17461-gc1e499ed6604 #1 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/u16:4/115 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffff8083110170 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: create_regulator+0x398/0x7ec
but task is already holding lock:
ffffff808378e170 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ww_mutex_trylock+0x3c/0x7b8
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex);
lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by kworker/u16:4/115:
#0: ffffff808006a948 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x520/0x1348
#1: ffffffc00e0a7cc0 ((work_completion)(&entry->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x55c/0x1348
#2: ffffff80828a2260 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach_async_helper+0xd0/0x2a4
#3: ffffff808378e170 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ww_mutex_trylock+0x3c/0x7b8
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 115 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 5.15.104-lockdep-17461-gc1e499ed6604 #1 9292e52fa83c0e23762b2b3aa1bacf5787a4d5da
Hardware name: Google Quackingstick (rev0+) (DT)
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x4ec
show_stack+0x34/0x50
dump_stack_lvl+0xdc/0x11c
dump_stack+0x1c/0x48
__lock_acquire+0x16d4/0x6c74
lock_acquire+0x208/0x750
__mutex_lock_common+0x11c/0x11f8
ww_mutex_lock+0xc0/0x440
create_regulator+0x398/0x7ec
regulator_resolve_supply+0x654/0x7c4
regulator_register_resolve_supply+0x30/0x120
class_for_each_device+0x1b8/0x230
regulator_register+0x17a4/0x1f40
devm_regulator_register+0x60/0xd0
reg_fixed_voltage_probe+0x728/0xaec
platform_probe+0x150/0x1c8
really_probe+0x274/0xa20
__driver_probe_device+0x1dc/0x3f4
driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1c0
__device_attach_driver+0x1ac/0x2c8
bus_for_each_drv+0x11c/0x190
__device_attach_async_helper+0x1e4/0x2a4
async_run_entry_fn+0xa0/0x3ac
process_one_work+0x638/0x1348
worker_thread+0x4a8/0x9c4
kthread+0x2e4/0x3a0
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
The problem was first reported soon after we made many of the
regulators probe asynchronously, though nothing I've seen implies that
the problems couldn't have also happened even without that.
I haven't personally been able to reproduce the lockdep issue, but the
issue does look somewhat legitimate. Specifically, it looks like in
regulator_resolve_supply() we are holding a "rdev" lock while calling
set_supply() -> create_regulator() which grabs the lock of a
_different_ "rdev" (the one for our supply). This is not necessarily
safe from a lockdep perspective since there is no documented ordering
between these two locks.
In reality, we should always be locking a regulator before the
supplying regulator, so I don't expect there to be any real deadlocks
in practice. However, the regulator framework in general doesn't
express this to lockdep.
Let's fix the issue by simply grabbing the two locks involved in the
same way we grab multiple locks elsewhere in the regulator framework:
using the "wound/wait" mechanisms.
Fixes: eaa7995c52 ("regulator: core: avoid regulator_resolve_supply() race condition")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329143317.RFC.v2.2.I30d8e1ca10cfbe5403884cdd192253a2e063eb9e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b83a1772be ]
When a codepath locks a rdev using ww_mutex_lock_slow() directly then
that codepath is responsible for incrementing the "ref_cnt" and also
setting the "mutex_owner" to "current".
The regulator core consistently got that right for "ref_cnt" but
didn't always get it right for "mutex_owner". Let's fix this.
It's unlikely that this truly matters because the "mutex_owner" is
only needed if we're going to do subsequent locking of the same
rdev. However, even though it's not truly needed it seems less
surprising if we consistently set "mutex_owner" properly.
Fixes: f8702f9e4a ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329143317.RFC.v2.1.I4e9d433ea26360c06dd1381d091c82bb1a4ce843@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4fd8bcec5f ]
Explicitly bounds-check the id before accessing the opmode array. Seen
with GCC 13:
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c: In function 'max77802_enable':
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:217:29: warning: array subscript [0, 41] is outside array bounds of 'unsigned int[42]' [-Warray-bounds=]
217 | if (max77802->opmode[id] == MAX77802_OFF_PWRREQ)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:62:22: note: while referencing 'opmode'
62 | unsigned int opmode[MAX77802_REG_MAX];
| ^~~~~~
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127225203.never.864-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 02228f6aa6 ]
If the system does not come from reset (like when it is kexec()), the
regulator might have an IRQ waiting for us.
If we enable the IRQ handler before its structures are ready, we crash.
This patch fixes:
[ 1.141839] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual address 0000000000000078
[ 1.316096] Call trace:
[ 1.316101] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0xa8
[ 1.322757] cpu cpu0: dummy supplies not allowed for exclusive requests
[ 1.327823] regulator_notifier_call_chain+0x1c/0x2c
[ 1.327825] da9211_irq_handler+0x68/0xf8
[ 1.327829] irq_thread+0x11c/0x234
[ 1.327833] kthread+0x13c/0x154
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@dm.renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221124-da9211-v2-0-1779e3c5d491@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit cb3543cff9 upstream.
When updating the operating mode as part of regulator enable, the caller
has already locked the regulator tree and drms_uA_update() must not try
to do the same in order not to trigger a deadlock.
The lock inversion is reported by lockdep as:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.1.0-next-20221215 #142 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
udevd/154 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffc11f123d7e50 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x280
but task is already holding lock:
ffff80000e4c36e8 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: regulator_enable+0x34/0x80
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
lock(regulator_list_mutex);
lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
lock(regulator_list_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
just before probe of a Qualcomm UFS controller (occasionally) deadlocks
when enabling one of its regulators.
Fixes: 9243a195be ("regulator: core: Change voltage setting path")
Fixes: f8702f9e4a ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.0
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221215104646.19818-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 0591b14ce0 ]
I found a use_count leakage towards supply regulator of rdev with
boot-on option.
┌───────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────┐
│ regulator_dev A │ │ regulator_dev B │
│ (boot-on) │ │ (boot-on) │
│ use_count=0 │◀──supply──│ use_count=1 │
│ │ │ │
└───────────────────┘ └───────────────────┘
In case of rdev(A) configured with `regulator-boot-on', the use_count
of supplying regulator(B) will increment inside
regulator_enable(rdev->supply).
Thus, B will acts like always-on, and further balanced
regulator_enable/disable cannot actually disable it anymore.
However, B was also configured with `regulator-boot-on', we wish it
could be disabled afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <zr.zhang@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201033806.2567812-1-zr.zhang@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f2b41b748c ]
I got the the following report:
OF: ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2,
of_node_get()/of_node_put() unbalanced - destroy cset entry:
attach overlay node /i2c/pmic@62/regulators/exten
In of_get_regulator(), the node is returned from of_parse_phandle()
with refcount incremented, after using it, of_node_put() need be called.
Fixes: 69511a452e ("regulator: map consumer regulator based on device tree")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115091508.900752-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 1f386d6894 ]
I got a UAF report as following:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x935/0x2060
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810e838220 by task python3/268
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x67/0x83
print_report+0x178/0x4b0
kasan_report+0x90/0x190
__lock_acquire+0x935/0x2060
lock_acquire+0x156/0x400
_raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
lockref_get+0x11/0x30
simple_recursive_removal+0x41/0x440
debugfs_remove.part.12+0x32/0x50
debugfs_remove+0x29/0x30
_regulator_put.cold.54+0x3e/0x27f
regulator_put+0x1f/0x30
release_nodes+0x6a/0xa0
devres_release_all+0xf8/0x150
Allocated by task 37:
kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
__kasan_slab_alloc+0x5d/0x70
slab_post_alloc_hook+0x62/0x510
kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x222/0x5a0
__d_alloc+0x31/0x440
d_alloc+0x30/0xf0
d_alloc_parallel+0xc4/0xd20
__lookup_slow+0x15e/0x2f0
lookup_one_len+0x13a/0x150
start_creating+0xea/0x190
debugfs_create_dir+0x1e/0x210
create_regulator+0x254/0x4e0
_regulator_get+0x2a1/0x467
_devm_regulator_get+0x5a/0xb0
regulator_virtual_probe+0xb9/0x1a0
Freed by task 30:
kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x50
__kasan_slab_free+0x102/0x190
kmem_cache_free+0xf6/0x600
rcu_core+0x54c/0x12b0
__do_softirq+0xf2/0x5e3
Last potentially related work creation:
kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
__kasan_record_aux_stack+0x98/0xb0
call_rcu+0x42/0x700
dentry_free+0x6c/0xd0
__dentry_kill+0x23b/0x2d0
dput.part.31+0x431/0x780
simple_recursive_removal+0xa9/0x440
debugfs_remove.part.12+0x32/0x50
debugfs_remove+0x29/0x30
regulator_unregister+0xe3/0x230
release_nodes+0x6a/0xa0
==================================================================
Here is how happened:
processor A processor B
regulator_register()
rdev_init_debugfs()
rdev->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir()
devm_regulator_get()
rdev = regulator_dev_lookup()
create_regulator(rdev)
// using rdev->debugfs as parent
debugfs_create_dir(rdev->debugfs)
mfd_remove_devices_fn()
release_nodes()
regulator_unregister()
// free rdev->debugfs
debugfs_remove_recursive(rdev->debugfs)
release_nodes()
destroy_regulator()
debugfs_remove_recursive() <- causes UAF
In devm_regulator_get(), after getting rdev, the refcount
is get, so fix this by moving debugfs_remove_recursive()
to regulator_dev_release(), then it can be proctected by
the refcount, the 'rdev->debugfs' can not be freed until
the refcount is 0.
Fixes: 5de705194e ("regulator: Add basic per consumer debugfs")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116033706.3595812-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 5f4b204b6b ]
Here is a warning report about lack of registered release()
from kobject lib:
Device '(null)' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 48430 at drivers/base/core.c:2332 device_release+0x104/0x120
Call Trace:
kobject_put+0xdc/0x180
put_device+0x1b/0x30
regulator_register+0x651/0x1170
devm_regulator_register+0x4f/0xb0
When regulator_register() returns fail and directly goto `clean` symbol,
rdev->dev has not registered release() function yet (which is registered
by regulator_class in the following), so rdev needs to be freed manually.
If rdev->dev.of_node is not NULL, which means the of_node has gotten by
regulator_of_get_init_data(), it needs to call of_node_put() to avoid
refcount leak.
Otherwise, only calling put_device() would lead memory leak of rdev
in further:
unreferenced object 0xffff88810d0b1000 (size 2048):
comm "107-i2c-rtq6752", pid 48430, jiffies 4342258431 (age 1341.780s)
backtrace:
kmalloc_trace+0x22/0x110
regulator_register+0x184/0x1170
devm_regulator_register+0x4f/0xb0
When regulator_register() returns fail and goto `wash` symbol,
rdev->dev has registered release() function, so directly call
put_device() to cleanup everything.
Fixes: d3c731564e ("regulator: plug of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error path")
Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116074339.1024240-1-zengheng4@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 8478ed5844 upstream.
On recent kernels, the PM8058 L16 (or any other PM8058 LDO-regulator)
does not come up if they are supplied by an SMPS-regulator. This
is not very strange since the regulators are registered in a long
array and the L-regulators are registered before the S-regulators,
and if an L-regulator defers, it will never get around to registering
the S-regulator that it needs.
See arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8060-dragonboard.dts:
pm8058-regulators {
(...)
vdd_l13_l16-supply = <&pm8058_s4>;
(...)
Ooops.
Fix this by moving the PM8058 S-regulators first in the array.
Do the same for the PM8901 S-regulators (though this is currently
not causing any problems with out device trees) so that the pattern
of registration order is the same on all PMnnnn chips.
Fixes: 087a1b5cdd ("regulator: qcom: Rework to single platform device")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220909112529.239143-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 78e1e867f4 ]
The pfuze_chip::regulator_descs is an array of size
PFUZE100_MAX_REGULATOR, the pfuze_chip::pfuze_regulators
is the pointer to the real regulators of a specific device.
The number of real regulator is supposed to be less than
the PFUZE100_MAX_REGULATOR, so we should use the size of
'regulator_num * sizeof(struct pfuze_regulator)' in memcpy().
This fixes the out of bounds access bug reported by KASAN.
Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@windriver.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220825111922.1368055-1-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c32f1ebfd2 ]
If regulator_enable() fails, enable_count is incremented still.
A consumer, assuming no matching regulator_disable() is necessary on
failure, will then get this error message upon regulator_put()
since enable_count is non-zero:
[ 1.277418] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1 at drivers/regulator/core.c:2304 _regulator_put.part.0+0x168/0x170
The consumer could try to fix this in their driver by cleaning up on
error from regulator_enable() (i.e. call regulator_disable()), but that
results in the following since regulator_enable() failed and didn't
increment user_count:
[ 1.258112] unbalanced disables for vreg_l17c
[ 1.262606] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 1 at drivers/regulator/core.c:2899 _regulator_disable+0xd4/0x190
Fix this by decrementing enable_count upon failure to enable.
With this in place, just the reason for failure to enable is printed
as expected and developers can focus on the root cause of their issue
instead of thinking their usage of the regulator consumer api is
incorrect. For example, in my case:
[ 1.240426] vreg_l17c: invalid input voltage found
Fixes: 5451781dad ("regulator: core: Only count load for enabled consumers")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220819194336.382740-1-ahalaney@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c3e3ca05da ]
Since the introduction of regulator->enable_count, a driver that did
an exclusive get on an already-enabled regulator would end up with
enable_count initialized to 0 but rdev->use_count initialized to 1.
With that starting point the regulator is effectively stuck enabled,
because if the driver attempted to disable it it would fail the
enable_count underflow check in _regulator_handle_consumer_disable().
The EXCLUSIVE_GET path in _regulator_get() now initializes
enable_count along with rdev->use_count so that the regulator can be
disabled without underflowing the former.
Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@bewilderbeest.net>
Fixes: 5451781dad ("regulator: core: Only count load for enabled consumers")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220505043152.12933-1-zev@bewilderbeest.net
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6390d42c21 ]
drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c:1318:1-33: WARNING: Function "for_each_available_child_of_node" should have of_node_put() before return around line 1321.
Semantic patch information:
False positives can be due to function calls within the for_each
loop that may encapsulate an of_node_put.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/iterators/for_each_child.cocci
Fixes: 14e2976fba ("regulator: qcom_smd: Align probe function with rpmh-regulator")
CC: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2201151210170.3051@hadrien
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 14e2976fba ]
The RPMh regulator driver is much newer and gets more attention, which in
consequence makes it do a few things better. Update qcom_smd-regulator's
probe function to mimic what rpmh-regulator does to address a couple of
issues:
- Probe defer now works correctly, before it used to, well,
kinda just die.. This fixes reliable probing on (at least) PM8994,
because Linux apparently cannot deal with supply map dependencies yet..
- Regulator data is now matched more sanely: regulator data is matched
against each individual regulator node name and throwing an -EINVAL if
data is missing, instead of just assuming everything is fine and
iterating over all subsequent array members.
- status = "disabled" will now work for disabling individual regulators in
DT. Previously it didn't seem to do much if anything at all.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211230023442.1123424-1-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit b16bef60a9 upstream.
The driver and its bindings, before commit 04f9f068a6 ("regulator:
s5m8767: Modify parsing method of the voltage table of buck2/3/4") were
requiring to provide at least one safe/default voltage for DVS registers
if DVS GPIO is not being enabled.
IOW, if s5m8767,pmic-buck2-uses-gpio-dvs is missing, the
s5m8767,pmic-buck2-dvs-voltage should still be present and contain one
voltage.
This requirement was coming from driver behavior matching this condition
(none of DVS GPIO is enabled): it was always initializing the DVS
selector pins to 0 and keeping the DVS enable setting at reset value
(enabled). Therefore if none of DVS GPIO is enabled in devicetree,
driver was configuring the first DVS voltage for buck[234].
Mentioned commit 04f9f068a6 ("regulator: s5m8767: Modify parsing
method of the voltage table of buck2/3/4") broke it because DVS voltage
won't be parsed from devicetree if DVS GPIO is not enabled. After the
change, driver will configure bucks to use the register reset value as
voltage which might have unpleasant effects.
Fix this by relaxing the bindings constrain: if DVS GPIO is not enabled
in devicetree (therefore DVS voltage is also not parsed), explicitly
disable it.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: 04f9f068a6 ("regulator: s5m8767: Modify parsing method of the voltage table of buck2/3/4")
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Message-Id: <20211008113723.134648-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 98e47570ba ]
In commit e915331149 ("regulator: vctrl-regulator: Avoid deadlock getting
and setting the voltage"), all calls to get/set the voltage of the
control regulator were switched to unlocked versions to avoid deadlocks.
However, the call in the probe path is done without regulator locks
held. In this case the locked version should be used.
Switch back to the locked regulator_get_voltage() in the probe path to
avoid any mishaps.
Fixes: e915331149 ("regulator: vctrl-regulator: Avoid deadlock getting and setting the voltage")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210825033704.3307263-2-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 1c73daee4b ]
Since config.dev = pdev->dev.parent in current code, so
dev_get_drvdata(rdev->dev.parent) call in hi6421_regulator_enable
returns the drvdata of the mfd device rather than the regulator. Fix it.
This was broken while converting to use simplified DT parsing because the
config.dev changed from pdev->dev to pdev->dev.parent for parsing the
parent's of_node.
Fixes: 29dc269a85 ("regulator: hi6421: Convert to use simplified DT parsing")
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210630095959.2411543-1-axel.lin@ingics.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 6f55c5dd11 upstream.
The MAX77620 driver fails to re-probe on deferred probe because driver
core tries to claim resources that are already claimed by the PINCTRL
device. Use device_set_of_node_from_dev() helper which marks OF node as
reused, skipping erroneous execution of pinctrl_bind_pins() for the PMIC
device on the re-probe.
Fixes: aea6cb9970 ("regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210523224243.13219-2-digetx@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 3b6e7088af ]
According to Table 30 ("DVFS_MoniVDAC [6:0] Setting Table") in the
BD9571MWV-M Datasheet Rev. 002, the valid voltage range is 600..1100 mV
(settings 0x3c..0x6e). While the lower limit is taken into account (by
setting regulator_desc.linear_min_sel to 0x3c), the upper limit is not.
Fix this by reducing regulator_desc.n_voltages from 0x80 to 0x6f.
Fixes: e85c5a153f ("regulator: Add ROHM BD9571MWV-M PMIC regulator driver")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130242.3390038-2-geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Mikhail Rudenko