[ Upstream commit dd2569fbb0 ]
Fix two issues with introspecting the task mode.
1. If a task is attached to a unconfined profile that is not the
ns->unconfined profile then. Mode the mode is always reported
as -
$ ps -Z
LABEL PID TTY TIME CMD
unconfined 1287 pts/0 00:00:01 bash
test (-) 1892 pts/0 00:00:00 ps
instead of the correct value of (unconfined) as shown below
$ ps -Z
LABEL PID TTY TIME CMD
unconfined 2483 pts/0 00:00:01 bash
test (unconfined) 3591 pts/0 00:00:00 ps
2. if a task is confined by a stack of profiles that are unconfined
the output of label mode is again the incorrect value of (-) like
above, instead of (unconfined). This is because the visibile
profile count increment is skipped by the special casing of
unconfined.
Fixes: f1bd904175 ("apparmor: add the base fns() for domain labels")
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 00e0590dba ]
The sanity check in macro update_for_len checks to see if len
is less than zero, however, len is a size_t so it can never be
less than zero, so this sanity check is a no-op. Fix this by
making len a ssize_t so the comparison will work and add ulen
that is a size_t copy of len so that the min() macro won't
throw warnings about comparing different types.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Macro compares unsigned to 0")
Fixes: f1bd904175 ("apparmor: add the base fns() for domain labels")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sparse reports
poisoning the proxy->label before freeing the struct is resulting in
a sparse build warning.
../security/apparmor/label.c:52:30: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
../security/apparmor/label.c:52:30: expected struct aa_label [noderef] <asn:4>*label
../security/apparmor/label.c:52:30: got struct aa_label *<noident>
fix with RCU_INIT_POINTER as this is one of those cases where
rcu_assign_pointer() is not needed.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
With apparmor policy virtualization based on policy namespace View's
we don't generally want/need absolute root based views, however there
are cases like debugging and some secid based conversions where
using a root based view is important.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@canonical.com>
Begin moving apparmor to using broader domain labels, that will allow
run time computation of domain type splitting via "stacking" of
profiles into a domain label vec.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
John Johansen