ceph: try to allocate a smaller extent map for sparse read
In fscrypt case and for a smaller read length we can predict the max count of the extent map. And for small read length use cases this could save some memories. [ idryomov: squash into a single patch to avoid build break, drop redundant variable in ceph_alloc_sparse_ext_map() ] Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -572,9 +572,12 @@ int __ceph_alloc_sparse_ext_map(struct ceph_osd_req_op *op, int cnt);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define CEPH_SPARSE_EXT_ARRAY_INITIAL 16
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int ceph_alloc_sparse_ext_map(struct ceph_osd_req_op *op)
|
||||
static inline int ceph_alloc_sparse_ext_map(struct ceph_osd_req_op *op, int cnt)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return __ceph_alloc_sparse_ext_map(op, CEPH_SPARSE_EXT_ARRAY_INITIAL);
|
||||
if (!cnt)
|
||||
cnt = CEPH_SPARSE_EXT_ARRAY_INITIAL;
|
||||
|
||||
return __ceph_alloc_sparse_ext_map(op, cnt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
extern void ceph_osdc_get_request(struct ceph_osd_request *req);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user