From c00d738e1673ab801e1577e4e3c780ccf88b1a5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:19:27 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] bpf: Revert "bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL" This patch reverts commit cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL"). The patch was well-intended and meant to be as a stop-gap fixing branch prediction when the pointer may actually be NULL at runtime. Eventually, it was supposed to be replaced by an automated script or compiler pass detecting possibly NULL arguments and marking them accordingly. However, it caused two main issues observed for production programs and failed to preserve backwards compatibility. First, programs relied on the verifier not exploring == NULL branch when pointer is not NULL, thus they started failing with a 'dereference of scalar' error. Next, allowing raw_tp arguments to be modified surfaced the warning in the verifier that warns against reg->off when PTR_MAYBE_NULL is set. More information, context, and discusson on both problems is available in [0]. Overall, this approach had several shortcomings, and the fixes would further complicate the verifier's logic, and the entire masking scheme would have to be removed eventually anyway. Hence, revert the patch in preparation of a better fix avoiding these issues to replace this commit. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241206161053.809580-1-memxor@gmail.com Reported-by: Manu Bretelle Fixes: cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213221929.3495062-2-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- include/linux/bpf.h | 6 -- kernel/bpf/btf.c | 5 +- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 79 ++----------------- .../bpf/progs/test_tp_btf_nullable.c | 6 +- 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 805040813f5d..6e63dd3443b9 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -3514,10 +3514,4 @@ static inline bool bpf_is_subprog(const struct bpf_prog *prog) return prog->aux->func_idx != 0; } -static inline bool bpf_prog_is_raw_tp(const struct bpf_prog *prog) -{ - return prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING && - prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP; -} - #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */ diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c index a63a03582f02..c4aa304028ce 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c @@ -6594,10 +6594,7 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type, if (prog_args_trusted(prog)) info->reg_type |= PTR_TRUSTED; - /* Raw tracepoint arguments always get marked as maybe NULL */ - if (bpf_prog_is_raw_tp(prog)) - info->reg_type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL; - else if (btf_param_match_suffix(btf, &args[arg], "__nullable")) + if (btf_param_match_suffix(btf, &args[arg], "__nullable")) info->reg_type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL; if (tgt_prog) { diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 5e541339b2f6..f7f892a52a37 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -420,25 +420,6 @@ static struct btf_record *reg_btf_record(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) return rec; } -static bool mask_raw_tp_reg_cond(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { - return reg->type == (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED | PTR_MAYBE_NULL) && - bpf_prog_is_raw_tp(env->prog) && !reg->ref_obj_id; -} - -static bool mask_raw_tp_reg(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) -{ - if (!mask_raw_tp_reg_cond(env, reg)) - return false; - reg->type &= ~PTR_MAYBE_NULL; - return true; -} - -static void unmask_raw_tp_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, bool result) -{ - if (result) - reg->type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL; -} - static bool subprog_is_global(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog) { struct bpf_func_info_aux *aux = env->prog->aux->func_info_aux; @@ -6801,7 +6782,6 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const char *field_name = NULL; enum bpf_type_flag flag = 0; u32 btf_id = 0; - bool mask; int ret; if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) { @@ -6873,21 +6853,7 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, if (ret < 0) return ret; - /* For raw_tp progs, we allow dereference of PTR_MAYBE_NULL - * trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID, these are the ones that are possibly - * arguments to the raw_tp. Since internal checks in for trusted - * reg in check_ptr_to_btf_access would consider PTR_MAYBE_NULL - * modifier as problematic, mask it out temporarily for the - * check. Don't apply this to pointers with ref_obj_id > 0, as - * those won't be raw_tp args. - * - * We may end up applying this relaxation to other trusted - * PTR_TO_BTF_ID with maybe null flag, since we cannot - * distinguish PTR_MAYBE_NULL tagged for arguments vs normal - * tagging, but that should expand allowed behavior, and not - * cause regression for existing behavior. - */ - mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); + if (ret != PTR_TO_BTF_ID) { /* just mark; */ @@ -6948,13 +6914,8 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, clear_trusted_flags(&flag); } - if (atype == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) { + if (atype == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) mark_btf_ld_reg(env, regs, value_regno, ret, reg->btf, btf_id, flag); - /* We've assigned a new type to regno, so don't undo masking. */ - if (regno == value_regno) - mask = false; - } - unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); return 0; } @@ -7329,7 +7290,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); } else if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BTF_ID && - (mask_raw_tp_reg_cond(env, reg) || !type_may_be_null(reg->type))) { + !type_may_be_null(reg->type)) { err = check_ptr_to_btf_access(env, regs, regno, off, size, t, value_regno); } else if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP) { @@ -9032,7 +8993,6 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg, enum bpf_reg_type type = reg->type; u32 *arg_btf_id = NULL; int err = 0; - bool mask; if (arg_type == ARG_DONTCARE) return 0; @@ -9073,11 +9033,11 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg, base_type(arg_type) == ARG_PTR_TO_SPIN_LOCK) arg_btf_id = fn->arg_btf_id[arg]; - mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); err = check_reg_type(env, regno, arg_type, arg_btf_id, meta); + if (err) + return err; - err = err ?: check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, regno, arg_type); - unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); + err = check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, regno, arg_type); if (err) return err; @@ -9872,17 +9832,14 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog, return ret; } else if (base_type(arg->arg_type) == ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID) { struct bpf_call_arg_meta meta; - bool mask; int err; if (register_is_null(reg) && type_may_be_null(arg->arg_type)) continue; memset(&meta, 0, sizeof(meta)); /* leave func_id as zero */ - mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); err = check_reg_type(env, regno, arg->arg_type, &arg->btf_id, &meta); err = err ?: check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, regno, arg->arg_type); - unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); if (err) return err; } else { @@ -12205,7 +12162,6 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ enum bpf_arg_type arg_type = ARG_DONTCARE; u32 regno = i + 1, ref_id, type_size; bool is_ret_buf_sz = false; - bool mask = false; int kf_arg_type; t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL); @@ -12264,15 +12220,12 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ return -EINVAL; } - mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); if ((is_kfunc_trusted_args(meta) || is_kfunc_rcu(meta)) && (register_is_null(reg) || type_may_be_null(reg->type)) && !is_kfunc_arg_nullable(meta->btf, &args[i])) { verbose(env, "Possibly NULL pointer passed to trusted arg%d\n", i); - unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); return -EACCES; } - unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); if (reg->ref_obj_id) { if (is_kfunc_release(meta) && meta->ref_obj_id) { @@ -12330,24 +12283,16 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ if (!is_kfunc_trusted_args(meta) && !is_kfunc_rcu(meta)) break; - /* Allow passing maybe NULL raw_tp arguments to - * kfuncs for compatibility. Don't apply this to - * arguments with ref_obj_id > 0. - */ - mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); if (!is_trusted_reg(reg)) { if (!is_kfunc_rcu(meta)) { verbose(env, "R%d must be referenced or trusted\n", regno); - unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); return -EINVAL; } if (!is_rcu_reg(reg)) { verbose(env, "R%d must be a rcu pointer\n", regno); - unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); return -EINVAL; } } - unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); fallthrough; case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CTX: case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR: @@ -12370,9 +12315,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ if (is_kfunc_release(meta) && reg->ref_obj_id) arg_type |= OBJ_RELEASE; - mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); ret = check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, regno, arg_type); - unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); if (ret < 0) return ret; @@ -12549,7 +12492,6 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ ref_tname = btf_name_by_offset(btf, ref_t->name_off); fallthrough; case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID: - mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); /* Only base_type is checked, further checks are done here */ if ((base_type(reg->type) != PTR_TO_BTF_ID || (bpf_type_has_unsafe_modifiers(reg->type) && !is_rcu_reg(reg))) && @@ -12558,11 +12500,9 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ verbose(env, "expected %s or socket\n", reg_type_str(env, base_type(reg->type) | (type_flag(reg->type) & BPF_REG_TRUSTED_MODIFIERS))); - unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); return -EINVAL; } ret = process_kf_arg_ptr_to_btf_id(env, reg, ref_t, ref_tname, ref_id, meta, i); - unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); if (ret < 0) return ret; break; @@ -13535,7 +13475,7 @@ static int sanitize_check_bounds(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, */ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, - struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg, + const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg, const struct bpf_reg_state *off_reg) { struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state; @@ -13549,7 +13489,6 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_sanitize_info info = {}; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); u32 dst = insn->dst_reg; - bool mask; int ret; dst_reg = ®s[dst]; @@ -13576,14 +13515,11 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return -EACCES; } - mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, ptr_reg); if (ptr_reg->type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL) { verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic on %s prohibited, null-check it first\n", dst, reg_type_str(env, ptr_reg->type)); - unmask_raw_tp_reg(ptr_reg, mask); return -EACCES; } - unmask_raw_tp_reg(ptr_reg, mask); switch (base_type(ptr_reg->type)) { case PTR_TO_CTX: @@ -20126,7 +20062,6 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) * for this case. */ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | PTR_UNTRUSTED: - case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED | PTR_MAYBE_NULL: if (type == BPF_READ) { if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM) insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tp_btf_nullable.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tp_btf_nullable.c index 5aaf2b065f86..bba3e37f749b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tp_btf_nullable.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tp_btf_nullable.c @@ -7,11 +7,7 @@ #include "bpf_misc.h" SEC("tp_btf/bpf_testmod_test_nullable_bare") -/* This used to be a failure test, but raw_tp nullable arguments can now - * directly be dereferenced, whether they have nullable annotation or not, - * and don't need to be explicitly checked. - */ -__success +__failure __msg("R1 invalid mem access 'trusted_ptr_or_null_'") int BPF_PROG(handle_tp_btf_nullable_bare1, struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx *nullable_ctx) { return nullable_ctx->len; From 838a10bd2ebfe11a60dd67687533a7cfc220cc86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:19:28 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] bpf: Augment raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL Arguments to a raw tracepoint are tagged as trusted, which carries the semantics that the pointer will be non-NULL. However, in certain cases, a raw tracepoint argument may end up being NULL. More context about this issue is available in [0]. Thus, there is a discrepancy between the reality, that raw_tp arguments can actually be NULL, and the verifier's knowledge, that they are never NULL, causing explicit NULL check branch to be dead code eliminated. A previous attempt [1], i.e. the second fixed commit, was made to simulate symbolic execution as if in most accesses, the argument is a non-NULL raw_tp, except for conditional jumps. This tried to suppress branch prediction while preserving compatibility, but surfaced issues with production programs that were difficult to solve without increasing verifier complexity. A more complete discussion of issues and fixes is available at [2]. Fix this by maintaining an explicit list of tracepoints where the arguments are known to be NULL, and mark the positional arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL. Additionally, capture the tracepoints where arguments are known to be ERR_PTR, and mark these arguments as scalar values to prevent potential dereference. Each hex digit is used to encode NULL-ness (0x1) or ERR_PTR-ness (0x2), shifted by the zero-indexed argument number x 4. This can be represented as follows: 1st arg: 0x1 2nd arg: 0x10 3rd arg: 0x100 ... and so on (likewise for ERR_PTR case). In the future, an automated pass will be used to produce such a list, or insert __nullable annotations automatically for tracepoints. Each compilation unit will be analyzed and results will be collated to find whether a tracepoint pointer is definitely not null, maybe null, or an unknown state where verifier conservatively marks it PTR_MAYBE_NULL. A proof of concept of this tool from Eduard is available at [3]. Note that in case we don't find a specification in the raw_tp_null_args array and the tracepoint belongs to a kernel module, we will conservatively mark the arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL. This is because unlike for in-tree modules, out-of-tree module tracepoints may pass NULL freely to the tracepoint. We don't protect against such tracepoints passing ERR_PTR (which is uncommon anyway), lest we mark all such arguments as SCALAR_VALUE. While we are it, let's adjust the test raw_tp_null to not perform dereference of the skb->mark, as that won't be allowed anymore, and make it more robust by using inline assembly to test the dead code elimination behavior, which should still stay the same. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZrCZS6nisraEqehw@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241104171959.2938862-1-memxor@gmail.com [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241206161053.809580-1-memxor@gmail.com [3]: https://github.com/eddyz87/llvm-project/tree/nullness-for-tracepoint-params Reported-by: Juri Lelli # original bug Reported-by: Manu Bretelle # bugs in masking fix Fixes: 3f00c5239344 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs") Fixes: cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL") Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman Co-developed-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213221929.3495062-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/btf.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null.c | 19 ++- 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c index c4aa304028ce..e5a5f023cedd 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c @@ -6439,6 +6439,101 @@ int btf_ctx_arg_offset(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *func_proto, return off; } +struct bpf_raw_tp_null_args { + const char *func; + u64 mask; +}; + +static const struct bpf_raw_tp_null_args raw_tp_null_args[] = { + /* sched */ + { "sched_pi_setprio", 0x10 }, + /* ... from sched_numa_pair_template event class */ + { "sched_stick_numa", 0x100 }, + { "sched_swap_numa", 0x100 }, + /* afs */ + { "afs_make_fs_call", 0x10 }, + { "afs_make_fs_calli", 0x10 }, + { "afs_make_fs_call1", 0x10 }, + { "afs_make_fs_call2", 0x10 }, + { "afs_protocol_error", 0x1 }, + { "afs_flock_ev", 0x10 }, + /* cachefiles */ + { "cachefiles_lookup", 0x1 | 0x200 }, + { "cachefiles_unlink", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_rename", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_prep_read", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_mark_active", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_mark_failed", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_mark_inactive", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_vfs_error", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_io_error", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_open", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_copen", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_close", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_read", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_cread", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_fd_write", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release", 0x1 }, + /* ext4, from ext4__mballoc event class */ + { "ext4_mballoc_discard", 0x10 }, + { "ext4_mballoc_free", 0x10 }, + /* fib */ + { "fib_table_lookup", 0x100 }, + /* filelock */ + /* ... from filelock_lock event class */ + { "posix_lock_inode", 0x10 }, + { "fcntl_setlk", 0x10 }, + { "locks_remove_posix", 0x10 }, + { "flock_lock_inode", 0x10 }, + /* ... from filelock_lease event class */ + { "break_lease_noblock", 0x10 }, + { "break_lease_block", 0x10 }, + { "break_lease_unblock", 0x10 }, + { "generic_delete_lease", 0x10 }, + { "time_out_leases", 0x10 }, + /* host1x */ + { "host1x_cdma_push_gather", 0x10000 }, + /* huge_memory */ + { "mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd", 0x10 }, + { "mm_collapse_huge_page_isolate", 0x1 }, + { "mm_khugepaged_scan_file", 0x10 }, + { "mm_khugepaged_collapse_file", 0x10 }, + /* kmem */ + { "mm_page_alloc", 0x1 }, + { "mm_page_pcpu_drain", 0x1 }, + /* .. from mm_page event class */ + { "mm_page_alloc_zone_locked", 0x1 }, + /* netfs */ + { "netfs_failure", 0x10 }, + /* power */ + { "device_pm_callback_start", 0x10 }, + /* qdisc */ + { "qdisc_dequeue", 0x1000 }, + /* rxrpc */ + { "rxrpc_recvdata", 0x1 }, + { "rxrpc_resend", 0x10 }, + /* sunrpc */ + { "xs_stream_read_data", 0x1 }, + /* ... from xprt_cong_event event class */ + { "xprt_reserve_cong", 0x10 }, + { "xprt_release_cong", 0x10 }, + { "xprt_get_cong", 0x10 }, + { "xprt_put_cong", 0x10 }, + /* tcp */ + { "tcp_send_reset", 0x11 }, + /* tegra_apb_dma */ + { "tegra_dma_tx_status", 0x100 }, + /* timer_migration */ + { "tmigr_update_events", 0x1 }, + /* writeback, from writeback_folio_template event class */ + { "writeback_dirty_folio", 0x10 }, + { "folio_wait_writeback", 0x10 }, + /* rdma */ + { "mr_integ_alloc", 0x2000 }, + /* bpf_testmod */ + { "bpf_testmod_test_read", 0x0 }, +}; + bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type, const struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info) @@ -6449,6 +6544,7 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type, const char *tname = prog->aux->attach_func_name; struct bpf_verifier_log *log = info->log; const struct btf_param *args; + bool ptr_err_raw_tp = false; const char *tag_value; u32 nr_args, arg; int i, ret; @@ -6597,6 +6693,39 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type, if (btf_param_match_suffix(btf, &args[arg], "__nullable")) info->reg_type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL; + if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP) { + struct btf *btf = prog->aux->attach_btf; + const struct btf_type *t; + const char *tname; + + /* BTF lookups cannot fail, return false on error */ + t = btf_type_by_id(btf, prog->aux->attach_btf_id); + if (!t) + return false; + tname = btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off); + if (!tname) + return false; + /* Checked by bpf_check_attach_target */ + tname += sizeof("btf_trace_") - 1; + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(raw_tp_null_args); i++) { + /* Is this a func with potential NULL args? */ + if (strcmp(tname, raw_tp_null_args[i].func)) + continue; + if (raw_tp_null_args[i].mask & (0x1 << (arg * 4))) + info->reg_type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL; + /* Is the current arg IS_ERR? */ + if (raw_tp_null_args[i].mask & (0x2 << (arg * 4))) + ptr_err_raw_tp = true; + break; + } + /* If we don't know NULL-ness specification and the tracepoint + * is coming from a loadable module, be conservative and mark + * argument as PTR_MAYBE_NULL. + */ + if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(raw_tp_null_args) && btf_is_module(btf)) + info->reg_type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL; + } + if (tgt_prog) { enum bpf_prog_type tgt_type; @@ -6641,6 +6770,15 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type, bpf_log(log, "func '%s' arg%d has btf_id %d type %s '%s'\n", tname, arg, info->btf_id, btf_type_str(t), __btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off)); + + /* Perform all checks on the validity of type for this argument, but if + * we know it can be IS_ERR at runtime, scrub pointer type and mark as + * scalar. + */ + if (ptr_err_raw_tp) { + bpf_log(log, "marking pointer arg%d as scalar as it may encode error", arg); + info->reg_type = SCALAR_VALUE; + } return true; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(btf_ctx_access); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null.c index 457f34c151e3..5927054b6dd9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null.c @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ #include #include +#include "bpf_misc.h" char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; @@ -17,16 +18,14 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_raw_tp_null, struct sk_buff *skb) if (task->pid != tid) return 0; - i = i + skb->mark + 1; - /* The compiler may move the NULL check before this deref, which causes - * the load to fail as deref of scalar. Prevent that by using a barrier. + /* If dead code elimination kicks in, the increment +=2 will be + * removed. For raw_tp programs attaching to tracepoints in kernel + * modules, we mark input arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL, so branch + * prediction should never kick in. */ - barrier(); - /* If dead code elimination kicks in, the increment below will - * be removed. For raw_tp programs, we mark input arguments as - * PTR_MAYBE_NULL, so branch prediction should never kick in. - */ - if (!skb) - i += 2; + asm volatile ("%[i] += 1; if %[ctx] != 0 goto +1; %[i] += 2;" + : [i]"+r"(i) + : [ctx]"r"(skb) + : "memory"); return 0; } From 0da1955b5bd2af3a1c3d13916df06e34ffa6df3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:19:29 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add tests for raw_tp NULL args Add tests to ensure that arguments are correctly marked based on their specified positions, and whether they get marked correctly as maybe null. For modules, all tracepoint parameters should be marked PTR_MAYBE_NULL by default. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213221929.3495062-4-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_null.c | 3 +++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null_fail.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null_fail.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_null.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_null.c index 6fa19449297e..43676a9922dc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_null.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_null.c @@ -3,11 +3,14 @@ #include #include "raw_tp_null.skel.h" +#include "raw_tp_null_fail.skel.h" void test_raw_tp_null(void) { struct raw_tp_null *skel; + RUN_TESTS(raw_tp_null_fail); + skel = raw_tp_null__open_and_load(); if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "raw_tp_null__open_and_load")) return; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null_fail.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..38d669957bf1 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null_fail.c @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */ + +#include +#include +#include "bpf_misc.h" + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; + +/* Ensure module parameter has PTR_MAYBE_NULL */ +SEC("tp_btf/bpf_testmod_test_raw_tp_null") +__failure __msg("R1 invalid mem access 'trusted_ptr_or_null_'") +int test_raw_tp_null_bpf_testmod_test_raw_tp_null_arg_1(void *ctx) { + asm volatile("r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0); r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0);" ::: __clobber_all); + return 0; +} + +/* Check NULL marking */ +SEC("tp_btf/sched_pi_setprio") +__failure __msg("R1 invalid mem access 'trusted_ptr_or_null_'") +int test_raw_tp_null_sched_pi_setprio_arg_2(void *ctx) { + asm volatile("r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8); r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0);" ::: __clobber_all); + return 0; +}