TWxSoftware/twx-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

writeback: move dirty inodes from super_block to backing_dev_info

Browse Source 
This is a first step at introducing per-bdi flusher threads. We should
have no change in behaviour, although sb_has_dirty_inodes() is now
ridiculously expensive, as there's no easy way to answer that question.
Not a huge problem, since it'll be deleted in subsequent patches.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jens Axboe
2009-09-02 09:19:46 +02:00
parent d8a8559cd7
commit 66f3b8e2e1
6 changed files with 165 additions and 84 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
mm/page-writeback.c
+4 -7
View File
@@ -320,15 +320,13 @@ static void task_dirty_limit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *pdirty)
/*
*
*/
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bdi_lock);
static unsigned int bdi_min_ratio;
int bdi_set_min_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int min_ratio)
{
int ret = 0;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&bdi_lock, flags);
mutex_lock(&bdi_lock);
if (min_ratio > bdi->max_ratio) {
ret = -EINVAL;
} else {
@@ -340,27 +338,26 @@ int bdi_set_min_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int min_ratio)
ret = -EINVAL;
}
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bdi_lock, flags);
mutex_unlock(&bdi_lock);
return ret;
}
int bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned max_ratio)
{
unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
if (max_ratio > 100)
return -EINVAL;
spin_lock_irqsave(&bdi_lock, flags);
mutex_lock(&bdi_lock);
if (bdi->min_ratio > max_ratio) {
ret = -EINVAL;
} else {
bdi->max_ratio = max_ratio;
bdi->max_prop_frac = (PROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio) / 100;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bdi_lock, flags);
mutex_unlock(&bdi_lock);
return ret;
}