sched: wakeup preempt when small overlap

Lin Ming reported a 10% OLTP regression against 2.6.27-rc4.

The difference seems to come from different preemption agressiveness,
which affects the cache footprint of the workload and its effective
cache trashing.

Aggresively preempt a task if its avg overlap is very small, this should
avoid the task going to sleep and find it still running when we schedule
back to it - saving a wakeup.

Reported-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-20 23:38:02 +02:00
committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 09b22a2f67
commit 15afe09bf4
6 changed files with 22 additions and 14 deletions
+3 -3
View File
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ static int select_task_rq_idle(struct task_struct *p, int sync)
/*
* Idle tasks are unconditionally rescheduled:
*/
static void check_preempt_curr_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
static void check_preempt_curr_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
{
resched_task(rq->idle);
}
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static void switched_to_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
if (running)
resched_task(rq->curr);
else
check_preempt_curr(rq, p);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0);
}
static void prio_changed_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void prio_changed_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
if (p->prio > oldprio)
resched_task(rq->curr);
} else
check_preempt_curr(rq, p);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0);
}
/*